Showing posts with label Womyn's Issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Womyn's Issues. Show all posts

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Do Feminist Mothers Have to Choose Between Dreams and Diapers?

Rebecca Walker

Alice and Rebecca Walker Clash: Do Feminist Mothers Have to Choose Between Dreams and Diapers?

By Courtney E. Martin, AlterNet. Posted June 13, 2008.

Rebecca Walker is a well-known third-wave feminist and daughter of author Alice Walker. So why is she adopting anti-feminist talking points?

I meet women in their 40s who are devastated because they spent two decades working on a Ph.D or becoming a partner in a law firm, and they missed out on having a family. Thanks to the feminist movement, they discounted their biological clocks. They've missed the opportunity and they're bereft. Feminism has betrayed an entire generation of women into childlessness. It is devastating.

Who might you guess wrote such a bold denunciation of feminism? Perhaps one of the smug blondes that frequent Bill O'Reilly's lair -- Ann Coulter or Laura Ingraham? Perhaps ol' Atlantic Monthly anti-feminists Caitlin Flanagan or Lori Gottlieb, both of whom seem to think that contemporary women should settle for Mr. Good Enough and get hip to housework?

Nope, think again. These words were penned by none other than feminism's first daughter, Rebecca Walker. Read the rest of the story here.

Do Feminist Mothers Have to Choose Between Dreams and Diapers?

Rebecca Walker

Alice and Rebecca Walker Clash: Do Feminist Mothers Have to Choose Between Dreams and Diapers?

By Courtney E. Martin, AlterNet. Posted June 13, 2008.

Rebecca Walker is a well-known third-wave feminist and daughter of author Alice Walker. So why is she adopting anti-feminist talking points?

I meet women in their 40s who are devastated because they spent two decades working on a Ph.D or becoming a partner in a law firm, and they missed out on having a family. Thanks to the feminist movement, they discounted their biological clocks. They've missed the opportunity and they're bereft. Feminism has betrayed an entire generation of women into childlessness. It is devastating.

Who might you guess wrote such a bold denunciation of feminism? Perhaps one of the smug blondes that frequent Bill O'Reilly's lair -- Ann Coulter or Laura Ingraham? Perhaps ol' Atlantic Monthly anti-feminists Caitlin Flanagan or Lori Gottlieb, both of whom seem to think that contemporary women should settle for Mr. Good Enough and get hip to housework?

Nope, think again. These words were penned by none other than feminism's first daughter, Rebecca Walker. Read the rest of the story here.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

..::Classic Mother, Lover, Goddess::..

Here's what I was reading last April

The Feminine Face of Poverty

By Riane Eisler, AlterNet. Posted April 19, 2007.

Seventy percent of those living in absolute poverty in our world -- that is starving or on the edge of starvation -- are female. Not only that, in our wealthy United States, women and children are the mass of the poor and the poorest of the poor.

Read the whole article at:

http://alternet.org/rights/50727/

..::Classic Mother, Lover, Goddess::..

Here's what I was reading last April

The Feminine Face of Poverty

By Riane Eisler, AlterNet. Posted April 19, 2007.

Seventy percent of those living in absolute poverty in our world -- that is starving or on the edge of starvation -- are female. Not only that, in our wealthy United States, women and children are the mass of the poor and the poorest of the poor.

Read the whole article at:

http://alternet.org/rights/50727/

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Quilting and the Bee Goddess

CQs Shadow & Sun - Queen 84x92

I was inspired by recent posts from Lizz and Qalballah about quilting. I have loved quilts from as far back as I can remember. Something about them speaks to my soul. I love them so much I included them in my thesis so I thought I would share that part of my thesis with you now (bibliography available upon request).

Here it is....

Everyday Magick in an Amish Life

For the Amish, home is a sanctuary, it is God’s home (Bender 76). Amish families typically have 8 – 10 children (Bender 104) and from the beginning of their religion to be Amish has meant to reinvent the world together, in the everyday, as a family (Stoltzfus 78). In an Amish home one gets a feeling of Zen, according to Sue Bender. There is a natural self-forgetfulness in the Amish that lends to this feeling (Bender 77). Sue remarks that even something simple like washing dishes, is for them a sacred ritual that they all understand and follow (Bender 44).

Amish women have a spiritual connection with their tasks especially with that of sewing (Stoltzfus 78) and nothing brings Amish sewing to mind quite like the image of their famous Amish quilts. One of the most common quilting patterns the Amish use is called the sunshine and shadow pattern (Bender 146).

Amish1

To me this pattern is almost psychedelic in appearance and reminds me of something I might see at an outdoor music festival in Northern California. The use of dark and light brings to mind for me the ancient understanding of night and day, winter and summer, yin and yang, male and female – the natural harmony of life and nature. Amish women get together and quilt in quilting bees. This is a celebrated social occasion complete with special treats to eat and gossiping to be heard. Some quilting bees last several days and may be comprised of over a hundred women with nearly as many, if not more, children (110)!

I was very interested when I was doing my research with the phrase “Quilting Bee”. Where had it come from? So I looked it up. According to the Pittsburg Post Gazette the word “bee” used with “quilting”, “sewing” or “spelling” as uncertain origins. In England “been” or “bean” means to be given help by neighbors toward a particular task. The word “bee” was first recorded as being used in a “Spinning Bee” in 1769 and was used thereafter for “husking bees”, “apple bees” and “logging bees (Pittsburg Post Gazette).”

I have my own idea. In German the word for Bee is Biene. Bee Goddesses can be traced to the Minoan (Sicily) culture. The Bee Goddess represented community activity, diligence and work (Ransome). It seems an interesting synchronicity that the Bee Goddess would preside over community diligence and embody a spirit of work and community events that would come to be called “bees”.

800px-Plaque_bee-goddess_BM_GR1860.4-123.4

Quilting and the Bee Goddess

CQs Shadow & Sun - Queen 84x92

I was inspired by recent posts from Lizz and Qalballah about quilting. I have loved quilts from as far back as I can remember. Something about them speaks to my soul. I love them so much I included them in my thesis so I thought I would share that part of my thesis with you now (bibliography available upon request).

Here it is....

Everyday Magick in an Amish Life

For the Amish, home is a sanctuary, it is God’s home (Bender 76). Amish families typically have 8 – 10 children (Bender 104) and from the beginning of their religion to be Amish has meant to reinvent the world together, in the everyday, as a family (Stoltzfus 78). In an Amish home one gets a feeling of Zen, according to Sue Bender. There is a natural self-forgetfulness in the Amish that lends to this feeling (Bender 77). Sue remarks that even something simple like washing dishes, is for them a sacred ritual that they all understand and follow (Bender 44).

Amish women have a spiritual connection with their tasks especially with that of sewing (Stoltzfus 78) and nothing brings Amish sewing to mind quite like the image of their famous Amish quilts. One of the most common quilting patterns the Amish use is called the sunshine and shadow pattern (Bender 146).

Amish1

To me this pattern is almost psychedelic in appearance and reminds me of something I might see at an outdoor music festival in Northern California. The use of dark and light brings to mind for me the ancient understanding of night and day, winter and summer, yin and yang, male and female – the natural harmony of life and nature. Amish women get together and quilt in quilting bees. This is a celebrated social occasion complete with special treats to eat and gossiping to be heard. Some quilting bees last several days and may be comprised of over a hundred women with nearly as many, if not more, children (110)!

I was very interested when I was doing my research with the phrase “Quilting Bee”. Where had it come from? So I looked it up. According to the Pittsburg Post Gazette the word “bee” used with “quilting”, “sewing” or “spelling” as uncertain origins. In England “been” or “bean” means to be given help by neighbors toward a particular task. The word “bee” was first recorded as being used in a “Spinning Bee” in 1769 and was used thereafter for “husking bees”, “apple bees” and “logging bees (Pittsburg Post Gazette).”

I have my own idea. In German the word for Bee is Biene. Bee Goddesses can be traced to the Minoan (Sicily) culture. The Bee Goddess represented community activity, diligence and work (Ransome). It seems an interesting synchronicity that the Bee Goddess would preside over community diligence and embody a spirit of work and community events that would come to be called “bees”.

800px-Plaque_bee-goddess_BM_GR1860.4-123.4

Sunday, January 6, 2008

PMS, Pre Moon Shadow

Photobucket
Women are the only species who bleed in a cycle that matches exactly with the lunar cycle. Many of you know that if women were all taken out of artificial light, and returned to our wooded, wild, homes, we would all bleed at the new moon. In fact, on the KPFA show, Explorations, last week one scientist said that without the moon DNA itself would not exist.

We are tidal people, being pulled with the moon.

So what is the phenomenon known to the public at large as PMS? Is it hormonal? Lunar? Tidal? The result of unnatural living? Maybe it's completely made up?

The truth lies somewhere weaved up in all those things. As the moon or our personal moon, wanes down to dark, women are naturally drawn inward. We think about ourselves a little more, we become less accommodating and are more vocal about our needs and wants.

This is not a bad thing.

Nature is set up so that women who are bleeding are also, naturally, mothers. Many demands are put on mothers and we are usually happy to step in and nurture where we can. Once a month however, the moon reminds us to slow down, stop over stimulating ourselves - and quite frankly it reminds us to stop automatically taking everyone's shit.

It gives us a few days with a different perspective - the perspective of ME. What do I need? What's bugging me? Who loves me and who's taking advantage of me? What needs to stop and what do I need more of?

Of course this isn't how we are usually able to deal with this time in our lives. There's little quiet reflection and inward speculation for the average, modern woman. This is where PMS gets its bad reputation.

Our bodies, our minds and our souls are spinning wildly trying to get a message to our consciousness. Dashing and surging around our bodies the force of the moon is saying, "You-who! Over here! Look at me! Look at me!" But most of us don't, or can't or don't know to look.

After a very short while of that cosmic voice saying, "Make him pick up his dirty socks." the Kali-ma voice will step in and say "That lazy SOB can pick up his own damn dirty socks and he can DO IT RIGHT NOW!" PMS roars through us wiping everything clear that is unneeded and treating it with no mercy. Like a fire burning out all the dead brush it does so not to harm but to create a more fertile ground so that we can grow.

Our challenge as women of the modern era is to let that fire burn in a healthy manner, stoking our flames slowly yet keeping them hot. We must burn constructively and with purpose or the fire will randomly consume everything in its wake.

Run wild sisters!

Scream and yell in the middle of the woods, punch a pillow, journal, take a day off, take a bath, sit your man down and have a talk (if you can do it nicely, otherwise wait) and make the kids play in the yard for a bit. Let the fire burn and when it's out make good use of your rich, fertile soil. And in the meantime, know that its OK to not take some shit a few days per month.

PMS, Pre Moon Shadow

Photobucket
Women are the only species who bleed in a cycle that matches exactly with the lunar cycle. Many of you know that if women were all taken out of artificial light, and returned to our wooded, wild, homes, we would all bleed at the new moon. In fact, on the KPFA show, Explorations, last week one scientist said that without the moon DNA itself would not exist.

We are tidal people, being pulled with the moon.

So what is the phenomenon known to the public at large as PMS? Is it hormonal? Lunar? Tidal? The result of unnatural living? Maybe it's completely made up?

The truth lies somewhere weaved up in all those things. As the moon or our personal moon, wanes down to dark, women are naturally drawn inward. We think about ourselves a little more, we become less accommodating and are more vocal about our needs and wants.

This is not a bad thing.

Nature is set up so that women who are bleeding are also, naturally, mothers. Many demands are put on mothers and we are usually happy to step in and nurture where we can. Once a month however, the moon reminds us to slow down, stop over stimulating ourselves - and quite frankly it reminds us to stop automatically taking everyone's shit.

It gives us a few days with a different perspective - the perspective of ME. What do I need? What's bugging me? Who loves me and who's taking advantage of me? What needs to stop and what do I need more of?

Of course this isn't how we are usually able to deal with this time in our lives. There's little quiet reflection and inward speculation for the average, modern woman. This is where PMS gets its bad reputation.

Our bodies, our minds and our souls are spinning wildly trying to get a message to our consciousness. Dashing and surging around our bodies the force of the moon is saying, "You-who! Over here! Look at me! Look at me!" But most of us don't, or can't or don't know to look.

After a very short while of that cosmic voice saying, "Make him pick up his dirty socks." the Kali-ma voice will step in and say "That lazy SOB can pick up his own damn dirty socks and he can DO IT RIGHT NOW!" PMS roars through us wiping everything clear that is unneeded and treating it with no mercy. Like a fire burning out all the dead brush it does so not to harm but to create a more fertile ground so that we can grow.

Our challenge as women of the modern era is to let that fire burn in a healthy manner, stoking our flames slowly yet keeping them hot. We must burn constructively and with purpose or the fire will randomly consume everything in its wake.

Run wild sisters!

Scream and yell in the middle of the woods, punch a pillow, journal, take a day off, take a bath, sit your man down and have a talk (if you can do it nicely, otherwise wait) and make the kids play in the yard for a bit. Let the fire burn and when it's out make good use of your rich, fertile soil. And in the meantime, know that its OK to not take some shit a few days per month.

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Margaret Toscano Videos!

Margaret Toscano, is an Assistant Professor of Languages & Literature at the University of Utah. She is the theology editor for the Mormon Women's Forum Newsletter, co-author of Strangers in Paradox, contributing author to Women and Authority: Re-emerging Mormon Feminism, and a founder and former co-president of the Mormon Alliance.



The Early Years








Mormon Feminisim





LDS Dissent

Margaret Toscano Videos!

Margaret Toscano, is an Assistant Professor of Languages & Literature at the University of Utah. She is the theology editor for the Mormon Women's Forum Newsletter, co-author of Strangers in Paradox, contributing author to Women and Authority: Re-emerging Mormon Feminism, and a founder and former co-president of the Mormon Alliance.



The Early Years








Mormon Feminisim





LDS Dissent

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Women in the priestood and Polgamy in early Mormonism

(Full bibliography available upon request)

Women in the Priesthood

To begin talking about the priesthood as it was given to women we must first speak to the Relief Society. The Relief Society was a group begun for women under the direction of Joseph Smith, Emma Smith and Eliza Snow. In their book, Strangers in Paradox, Margaret (a University of Utah professor) and her husband Paul Toscano, put forth the idea that the Relief Society was established as a way to begin to confer the priesthood to women.

The first Relief Society meeting took place on March 17th, 1842. It was at this meeting that Joseph explicitly compared the Relief Society to the ecclesiastical priesthood within the Mormon Church, which had already been established. Joseph wanted to elect a presidency within the Relief Society and ordain them. Emma was then elected the first president of the Relief Society (Toscano 182).

Emma was called the “elect lady” by Joseph and he said that Emma’s election fulfilled the promise of Doctrine and Covenants 25 (scriptures within the LDS theology considered the word of God given to Joseph Smith through revelation). By reading D & C 25 this means that Emma was; “ordained under his hand to expound scriptures and to exhort the Church according as it shall be given thee by my spirit (Toscano 182-183).”

D & C 25 goes on to say that “he shall lay his hands upon thee, and thou shalt receive the Holy Ghost…” Which means that Emma and other women within the LDS church, and more specifically the Relief Society, are called through the churches founding prophet by the word of God (Spirit) - to expound upon scriptures, teach, learn and write by the fact that they have received the gift of the Holy Ghost (Toscano 182-183).

Joseph Smith spoke to women and the priesthood on a number of occasions, all of which I will not be covering here, but I will give a few more of my favorite examples. In his April 28th of 1842 discourse, Joseph Smith directly spoke to the relationship of women of the priesthood (Toscano 184).

You see at this point women had been giving blessing to each other and many male church members felt that this was wrong because blessings and priesthood were solely within the male domain. In reply to this objection Joseph said that women had the right to administer to the sick because of their ordination and authority they received through the Holy Ghost. He quoted Mark 16:16-18 and explained that casting out of devils, speaking in tongues, laying on of hands are given to all either male or female (Toscano 184).

He continued by saying, “…wherein they are ordained, it is a privilege of those set apart to administer in that authority which is conferr’d on them – and if the sisters should have faith to heal the sick, let all hold their tongues , and let every thing roll on (Toscano 184)”

Joseph had further justification for women’s authority to heal the sick. He said that soon women would have an even greater right to administer in spiritual gifts. He said that he was “turning the key” to them by revelation. He said that, “the time had not been before that these things could be in their proper order – that the Church is not now organiz’d in its proper order and cannot be until the Temple is completed (Toscano 185).”

At that time Joseph was hurrying to finish the Temple in Nauvoo since he had premonitions of his own death. He seemed to be grooming the Relief Society to raise women up to the level of priesthood so that they could fulfill the “will of God” when the Temple was completed. Joseph often referred to delivering the “keys” to the Relief Society which is very significant because in Mormon scriptures and theology the term “keys” implies priesthood rights and presiding authority (Toscano 185).

It’s important to take a moment here to pause and reflect on the seriousness of what Joseph was trying to do. From its beginnings, Mormonism has been a religion of restoration - trying to restore the true church, the true word of God, on earth. It seems that Joseph was called by the Spirit of God to very carefully lay a foundation whereby God was gradually giving women the priesthood.

Why is that if he wanted women to be priestesses he didn’t just come out and announce it to the world? We must think in terms of the 1800’s and the mindset of the time. Women did not have any rights then at all. They were seen by most as subhuman. They did not have the right to an education, they did not have the vote and they certainly did not hold religious positions – in fact, it was thought by some that women did not even have souls.

How radical a notion it would have been to give women the priesthood! Can you imagine how hard it would have been to just come out and declare it? So, in my opinion, Joseph was smart. He worked a little at a time. He set up the Relief Society, he argued for their right to heal the sick and confer blessings upon one another. He made speeches were he said he was about to turn the keys of the priesthood to them.
In the D & C 113 Joseph said that Zion cannot be strong until women were restored as equals (Hanks). We also find church history manuscripts which say that Joseph spoke about showing how the sisters of the church would come into the possession, blessings and privileges and gifts of the priesthood (Toscano 186).

My personal favorite reference to the priestesshood that Joseph was known to have said comes from an account given by Bathsheba W. Smith of Joseph addressing the Relief Society. She writes that Joseph, “wanted to make us, as the women were in Paul’s day, ‘a Kingdom of Priestesses (Toscano 183-184).’”

In an address given in 1842 to the Relief Society Joseph Smith said, “I am glad to have the opportunity of organizing the women, as a part of the priesthood belongs to them (Hanks).” It is amazing to think that upwards of 6 million or so women potentially gather on Sunday across the globe, following the sacrament meeting, for Relief Society within LDS churches – a kingdom of priestesses!

Polygamy

In popular culture many jokes about Mormons surround the once practiced doctrine of polygamy, or plural marriage. As I write these words a popular HBO TV drama called Big Love plays out one modern fundamentalist Mormon family’s trials and tribulations of one man who has three wives. The practice of polygamy within the church is a hot topic among Mormon and non Mormon scholars alike.

It seems that in the 1830’s Joseph Smith secretly began marrying women other than Emma, his first wife. It seems that at first at least, Emma did not know about this. Apparently the practice spread to other members of the church and led to difficulties in Kirtland, OH and later on in Nauvoo, IL, as non-Mormons in the area suffered from moral outrage (Toscano 250).

When the church split, the new LDS Prophet Brigham Young openly practiced polygamy and was even arrested on bigamy charges in 1863 (Toscano 250). Polygamy was widely practiced and even deemed necessary to attain the highest level of heaven at one point in LDS theology. In a general conference of the church on October 6, 1890 the practice was finally put to rest and outlawed. Some fundamentalists Mormon’s, the community of Hildale, Arizona for example, still practice polygamy. For the record, the Community of Christ has never practiced polygamy (www.cofc.org, Official website of the Community of Christ).

Polygamy seems a shocking and unacceptable practice by today’s standards. It seems demeaning to women – and many equate it to slavery. How could a church established on equality of women practice polygamy? Let’s first establish the difference between the practices of Joseph Smith and others who came later in church history.

Joseph Smith was sealed (a Mormon wedding practice which assures the couple will be together in the afterlife (www.lds.org, Official Website of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints)) to women who were already married and/or sealed to other men. This is not actually polygamy as we understand it today (multiple women married to one man) but is a form of plural marriage which consists of multiple people married to multiple people. It wasn’t until after Joseph’s death when the Saints had moved to Utah that they began practicing the type of polygamy they are infamous for, one man with multiple wives (some as many as forty as in the case of Brigham Young). These women were then not allowed to have other husbands.

What Joseph Smith practiced was not women-oppressing, multiple wife taking, female slavery. He did not even cohabitate with any of his plural wives. Furthermore, there are many examples in the bible of plural marriages, not just in the old testament but Mary, the mother of Jesus herself, conceived a child of God’s while married to Joseph (Toscano 250).

Many people in our culture practice what is known as serial monogamy. While having little tolerance for other marriage practices, we in the West, often get married, commit infidelity, divorce, separate and remarry. According to the anonymous author of the book Spiritual Polyamory (polyamory being a modern term to describe loving more than one person, at one time), the adaption of a more tribal marriage style encourages freedom, honesty, and self empowerment. Not relying on one person to make you whole, you instead rely upon yourself and your inner strength to contend with feelings of jealousy and lack of self worth (Spiritual Polyamory, author remains anonymous).

This type of multiple partnership has gained modern popularity. Articles and books on polyamory can be found, as well as support groups, websites and conferences. It is a lifestyle grounded in free choice and love. The movement even finds itself aligned with modern lifestyle revolutions such as the gay and lesbian movement and transgenderism (Spiritual Polyamory, author remains anonymous).

One can argue that what the LDS church practiced after Joseph’s death was not based in equality for women. Joseph Smith however obviously had no problem with his female partners having other male partners so the arrangement seems entirely equalitarian and not lacking for feminist approval. This is amazing and it is in keeping with the revolutionary aspect of Joseph’s attempt to further spirituality and restore old truths in the modern day.

Women in the priestood and Polgamy in early Mormonism

(Full bibliography available upon request)

Women in the Priesthood

To begin talking about the priesthood as it was given to women we must first speak to the Relief Society. The Relief Society was a group begun for women under the direction of Joseph Smith, Emma Smith and Eliza Snow. In their book, Strangers in Paradox, Margaret (a University of Utah professor) and her husband Paul Toscano, put forth the idea that the Relief Society was established as a way to begin to confer the priesthood to women.

The first Relief Society meeting took place on March 17th, 1842. It was at this meeting that Joseph explicitly compared the Relief Society to the ecclesiastical priesthood within the Mormon Church, which had already been established. Joseph wanted to elect a presidency within the Relief Society and ordain them. Emma was then elected the first president of the Relief Society (Toscano 182).

Emma was called the “elect lady” by Joseph and he said that Emma’s election fulfilled the promise of Doctrine and Covenants 25 (scriptures within the LDS theology considered the word of God given to Joseph Smith through revelation). By reading D & C 25 this means that Emma was; “ordained under his hand to expound scriptures and to exhort the Church according as it shall be given thee by my spirit (Toscano 182-183).”

D & C 25 goes on to say that “he shall lay his hands upon thee, and thou shalt receive the Holy Ghost…” Which means that Emma and other women within the LDS church, and more specifically the Relief Society, are called through the churches founding prophet by the word of God (Spirit) - to expound upon scriptures, teach, learn and write by the fact that they have received the gift of the Holy Ghost (Toscano 182-183).

Joseph Smith spoke to women and the priesthood on a number of occasions, all of which I will not be covering here, but I will give a few more of my favorite examples. In his April 28th of 1842 discourse, Joseph Smith directly spoke to the relationship of women of the priesthood (Toscano 184).

You see at this point women had been giving blessing to each other and many male church members felt that this was wrong because blessings and priesthood were solely within the male domain. In reply to this objection Joseph said that women had the right to administer to the sick because of their ordination and authority they received through the Holy Ghost. He quoted Mark 16:16-18 and explained that casting out of devils, speaking in tongues, laying on of hands are given to all either male or female (Toscano 184).

He continued by saying, “…wherein they are ordained, it is a privilege of those set apart to administer in that authority which is conferr’d on them – and if the sisters should have faith to heal the sick, let all hold their tongues , and let every thing roll on (Toscano 184)”

Joseph had further justification for women’s authority to heal the sick. He said that soon women would have an even greater right to administer in spiritual gifts. He said that he was “turning the key” to them by revelation. He said that, “the time had not been before that these things could be in their proper order – that the Church is not now organiz’d in its proper order and cannot be until the Temple is completed (Toscano 185).”

At that time Joseph was hurrying to finish the Temple in Nauvoo since he had premonitions of his own death. He seemed to be grooming the Relief Society to raise women up to the level of priesthood so that they could fulfill the “will of God” when the Temple was completed. Joseph often referred to delivering the “keys” to the Relief Society which is very significant because in Mormon scriptures and theology the term “keys” implies priesthood rights and presiding authority (Toscano 185).

It’s important to take a moment here to pause and reflect on the seriousness of what Joseph was trying to do. From its beginnings, Mormonism has been a religion of restoration - trying to restore the true church, the true word of God, on earth. It seems that Joseph was called by the Spirit of God to very carefully lay a foundation whereby God was gradually giving women the priesthood.

Why is that if he wanted women to be priestesses he didn’t just come out and announce it to the world? We must think in terms of the 1800’s and the mindset of the time. Women did not have any rights then at all. They were seen by most as subhuman. They did not have the right to an education, they did not have the vote and they certainly did not hold religious positions – in fact, it was thought by some that women did not even have souls.

How radical a notion it would have been to give women the priesthood! Can you imagine how hard it would have been to just come out and declare it? So, in my opinion, Joseph was smart. He worked a little at a time. He set up the Relief Society, he argued for their right to heal the sick and confer blessings upon one another. He made speeches were he said he was about to turn the keys of the priesthood to them.
In the D & C 113 Joseph said that Zion cannot be strong until women were restored as equals (Hanks). We also find church history manuscripts which say that Joseph spoke about showing how the sisters of the church would come into the possession, blessings and privileges and gifts of the priesthood (Toscano 186).

My personal favorite reference to the priestesshood that Joseph was known to have said comes from an account given by Bathsheba W. Smith of Joseph addressing the Relief Society. She writes that Joseph, “wanted to make us, as the women were in Paul’s day, ‘a Kingdom of Priestesses (Toscano 183-184).’”

In an address given in 1842 to the Relief Society Joseph Smith said, “I am glad to have the opportunity of organizing the women, as a part of the priesthood belongs to them (Hanks).” It is amazing to think that upwards of 6 million or so women potentially gather on Sunday across the globe, following the sacrament meeting, for Relief Society within LDS churches – a kingdom of priestesses!

Polygamy

In popular culture many jokes about Mormons surround the once practiced doctrine of polygamy, or plural marriage. As I write these words a popular HBO TV drama called Big Love plays out one modern fundamentalist Mormon family’s trials and tribulations of one man who has three wives. The practice of polygamy within the church is a hot topic among Mormon and non Mormon scholars alike.

It seems that in the 1830’s Joseph Smith secretly began marrying women other than Emma, his first wife. It seems that at first at least, Emma did not know about this. Apparently the practice spread to other members of the church and led to difficulties in Kirtland, OH and later on in Nauvoo, IL, as non-Mormons in the area suffered from moral outrage (Toscano 250).

When the church split, the new LDS Prophet Brigham Young openly practiced polygamy and was even arrested on bigamy charges in 1863 (Toscano 250). Polygamy was widely practiced and even deemed necessary to attain the highest level of heaven at one point in LDS theology. In a general conference of the church on October 6, 1890 the practice was finally put to rest and outlawed. Some fundamentalists Mormon’s, the community of Hildale, Arizona for example, still practice polygamy. For the record, the Community of Christ has never practiced polygamy (www.cofc.org, Official website of the Community of Christ).

Polygamy seems a shocking and unacceptable practice by today’s standards. It seems demeaning to women – and many equate it to slavery. How could a church established on equality of women practice polygamy? Let’s first establish the difference between the practices of Joseph Smith and others who came later in church history.

Joseph Smith was sealed (a Mormon wedding practice which assures the couple will be together in the afterlife (www.lds.org, Official Website of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints)) to women who were already married and/or sealed to other men. This is not actually polygamy as we understand it today (multiple women married to one man) but is a form of plural marriage which consists of multiple people married to multiple people. It wasn’t until after Joseph’s death when the Saints had moved to Utah that they began practicing the type of polygamy they are infamous for, one man with multiple wives (some as many as forty as in the case of Brigham Young). These women were then not allowed to have other husbands.

What Joseph Smith practiced was not women-oppressing, multiple wife taking, female slavery. He did not even cohabitate with any of his plural wives. Furthermore, there are many examples in the bible of plural marriages, not just in the old testament but Mary, the mother of Jesus herself, conceived a child of God’s while married to Joseph (Toscano 250).

Many people in our culture practice what is known as serial monogamy. While having little tolerance for other marriage practices, we in the West, often get married, commit infidelity, divorce, separate and remarry. According to the anonymous author of the book Spiritual Polyamory (polyamory being a modern term to describe loving more than one person, at one time), the adaption of a more tribal marriage style encourages freedom, honesty, and self empowerment. Not relying on one person to make you whole, you instead rely upon yourself and your inner strength to contend with feelings of jealousy and lack of self worth (Spiritual Polyamory, author remains anonymous).

This type of multiple partnership has gained modern popularity. Articles and books on polyamory can be found, as well as support groups, websites and conferences. It is a lifestyle grounded in free choice and love. The movement even finds itself aligned with modern lifestyle revolutions such as the gay and lesbian movement and transgenderism (Spiritual Polyamory, author remains anonymous).

One can argue that what the LDS church practiced after Joseph’s death was not based in equality for women. Joseph Smith however obviously had no problem with his female partners having other male partners so the arrangement seems entirely equalitarian and not lacking for feminist approval. This is amazing and it is in keeping with the revolutionary aspect of Joseph’s attempt to further spirituality and restore old truths in the modern day.